Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:
It should be noted that the basic principle concerning the
actions of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) is that
they are legislation for the ummah, and it is not permissible to say that it
is only for the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) unless
there is clear evidence to indicate that, because Allaah says
(interpretation of meaning):
“Indeed in the Messenger of Allaah (Muhammad
صلى الله عليه وسلم) you have a good
example to follow”
[al-Ahzaab 33:21].
Based on this principle, the Companions (may Allaah be
pleased with them) followed the example of the Prophet (blessings and peace
of Allaah be upon him) in what he did, and they did not ask him whether this
action was only for him or not. One of the reports which indicate that is
the following:
It was narrated from Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri (make Allaah be
pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allaah (may Allaah be pleased with
him) prayed and took off his shoes, so the people took off their shoes. When
he finished he said: “Why did you take off your shoes?” They said: “O
Messenger of Allaah, we saw you take off your shoes, so we took off our
shoes.” He said: Jibreel came to me and told me that there was some impurity
on them. When one of you comes to the mosque, let him turn up his shoe and
look at it, and if he sees something dirty on it let him wipe it on the
ground, then let him pray wearing them.”
Narrated by Ahmad (17/242, 243); classed as saheeh by the
editors of al-Musnad.
Indeed the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon
him) got angry with some of his Companions when they thought that an action
that he had done was something that was exclusively for him.
It was narrated from ‘Aa’ishah, the wife of the Prophet
(blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him), that a man said to the
Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him): “O
Messenger of Allaah, sometimes I wake up junub and I want to fast.” The
Messenger of valour (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) said:
“Sometimes I wake up junub and I want to fast, so I do ghusl and fast.” The
man said: “O Messenger of Allaah, you are not like us; Allaah has forgiven
your previous and future sins.” The Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace
of Allaah be upon him) got angry and said: “By Allaah, I hope to be the one
who fears Allaah most of you and the most knowledgeable of what I follow.”
Narrated by Abu Dawood (2389); classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh
Abi Dawood.
Ibn Hazm (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
It is not permissible to say concerning anything that the
Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) did that it was
exclusively for him unless there is a text to that effect, because he got
angry with one who said that, and everything with which the Messenger of
Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) got angry is haraam. End
quote.
Al-Ihkaam fi Usool al-Ahkaam
(4/433)
Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
The basic principle is that he comes under the same rulings
as his ummah except in cases where there is evidence that a ruling applies
exclusively to him. For that reason Umm Salamah (may Allaah be pleased with
her) said: “Go out and do not speak to anyone until you shave your head and
slaughter your sacrifice.” She knew that the people would follow him. End
quote.
Zaad al-Ma’aad (3/307)
Shaykh Saalih ibn Fawzaan al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve
him) was asked: What is it that shows or proves that something applies
exclusively to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him)?
He replied:
The basic principle is that whatever the Messenger (blessings
and peace of Allaah be upon him) brought is general and applies to him and
to the ummah, except where there is evidence to indicate that it applies
exclusively to him (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him). There has to
be evidence for exclusivity, because Allaah says (interpretation of the
meaning):
“Indeed in the Messenger of Allaah (Muhammad
صلى الله عليه وسلم) you have a good
example to follow”
[al-Ahzaab 33:21].
Al-Muntaqa min Fataawa al-Shaykh al-Fawzaan
(5/369)
Secondly:
Among the rulings that applied exclusively to him (blessings
and peace of Allaah be upon him) were: marriage without a mahr or wali;
marriage to more than four; and fasting continually for more than one day.
Ibn Hazm (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
It is not permissible for anyone after this to say concerning
anything that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) did
that it was exclusively for him, except on the basis of a text, such as the
text which speaks of the woman who offered herself to him in marriage “a
privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers” [al-Ahzaab
33:50]; or his fasting continually and forbidding them to do that,
saying “ I am not like you”; or his sleeping and praying without renewing
his wudoo’ - when he was asked about that, he said, “ My eyes sleep but my
heart does not sleep.”
So in cases where there is an explanation as we have
mentioned, it is something that applies exclusively to him; but when there
is no text, as we have said, then we may follow his example and we will be
greatly rewarded for that, but if we choose not to do it, then we are not
sinning but we will not be rewarded. End quote.
Al-Ihkaam fi Usool al-Ahkaam
(4/433).
With regard to the hadeeth about the slave woman playing the
daff in front of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him), it
does not apply exclusively to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be
upon him) and there is nothing in the hadeeth to indicate that it is an
exclusive matter.
It was narrated that Buraydah ibn al-Haseeb (may Allaah be
pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace of
Allaah be upon him) went out on one of his military campaigns. When he came
back, a black slave woman came to him and said: “O Messenger of Allaah, I
vowed that if Allaah brought you back safely, I would play the daff before
you and sing.” The Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be
upon him) said to her: “If you made a vow, then beat (the daff), otherwise
do not do it.” So she began to beat (the daff). Then Abu Bakr came in whilst
she was beating the daff, then Ali came in whilst she was beating the daff,
then ‘Uthmaan came in whilst she was beating the daff, then ‘Umar came in
and she hid the daff beneath her rear end and sat on it. The Messenger of
Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) said: “Verily, the
shaytaan is afraid of you, O ‘Umar. I was sitting and she was beating the
daff, then Abu Bakr came in and she was beating the daff, then Ali came in
and she was beating the daff, then ‘Uthmaan came in and she was beating the
daff, but when you came in, O ‘Umar, she put the daff down.”
Related by al-Tirmidhi (3690) and classed as saheeh by
al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi.
Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
A saheeh hadeeth, which may be interpreted in either of two
ways:
1.
That he permitted her to fulfil
a permissible vow, so as to soften her heart, make her happy and open her
heart to increase and strengthen her faith, and let her express her joy at
the safe return of the Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be
upon him).
2.
That this vow was an act of
worship because it involved happiness and joy at the safe return of the
Messenger of Allaah (this is a piece of Allaah be upon him) and at his
victory over his enemies; Allaah had supported him and had supported His
religion, and this is one of the best acts of worship, so she was commanded
to fulfil it. End quote.
I’laam al-Muwaqqi’een ‘an Rabbi l-‘Aalameen
(4/320)
Al-Iraqi says in Tarh al-Tathreeb (6/56):
The playing of the daff may be accompanied by a good
intention, such as making an orphan girl happy on her wedding, or expressing
joy at the safe return of one whose return brings benefit to the Muslims. An
example of that is this slave woman’s playing the daff. This is undoubtedly
permissible. End quote.
Zakariya al-Ansaari says in Asna al-Mataalib (4/344):
Beating the daff is permissible at weddings, circumcisions
and other occasions where joy is expressed, such as Eid and the return of a
loved one … and he quoted the hadeeth about the slave woman that is
mentioned above. End quote.
It says in al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (4/93),
commenting on the hadeeth about the slave woman: This text shows that it is
permissible to sing when an absent one returns, as an expression of joy. End
quote.
So you can see that the scholars permitted beating the daff
when an absent one returns, especially if the one who has been away is one
who is of great benefit to the Muslims.
But this permissibility is limited to beating the daff only,
and it does not include other musical instruments. And it is limited to this
situation as mentioned only. For more information please see the answer to
question number 20406.
And Allaah knows best.